Diff for "DocBook/Discuss" - Woodpecker Wiki for CPUG

Differences between revisions 3 and 5 (spanning 2 versions)

谁把DocBook和LaTex比较一下啊？
- 列表中已经有详细説明的了！简单的说，LaTex 长于图形排版，DocBook 长于图书的快捷组织; -- ZoomQuiet
- LaTex应该是比较适合数学吧，虽然DocBook好像也有支持MathML的方法。LaTex在组织方面也不差啊。我觉得DocBook更现代一点。它是完全的结构化、语义化的标记，而LaTex只能说基本上是。还有Tex

本身将非常固定了。Kunth说了，将只fix bugs，不会再加新特性了。而DocBook还在不断发展。-- WeakishJiang

-  ⇤ ← Revision 3 as of 2006-07-16 17:20:32 → 
  Size: 587
  Editor: WeakishJiang
  Comment:
+   ← Revision 5 as of 2006-07-16 17:25:54 → ⇥
  Size: 698
  Editor: WeakishJiang
  Comment:
-Deletions are marked like this.
+Additions are marked like this.
 Line 5:
-本身将非常固定了。Kunth说了，将只fix bugs，不会再加新特性了。而DocBook还在不断发展。
+本身将非常固定了。Kunth说了，将只fix bugs，不会再加新特性了。而DocBook还在不断发展。-- WeakishJiang

 * 我正在写一点DocBook的[http://wikish.woot.cc/DocbookGuide 笔记]。欢迎指教。